home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
032293
/
03229938.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
9KB
|
178 lines
<text id=93TT1254>
<title>
Mar. 22, 1993: Barbarians on the Screen
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
Mar. 22, 1993 Can Animals Think
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
TELEVISION, Page 66
Barbarians on the Screen
</hdr>
<body>
<p>A high-finance best seller comes to the tube with the greed
and nastiness intact, and much of the drama too
</p>
<p>By JOE QUEENAN
</p>
<p> In the service of truth and beauty, mankind has attempted
many seemingly impossible tasks down through the ages.
Michelangelo transformed a bare ceiling into one of the most
beautiful paintings in the world. Pablo Picasso fashioned a
stunning work of art out of a pair of abandoned bicycle
handlebars, and Marcel Duchamp achieved similar wonders with a
cast-off urinal. Now the folks at Home Box Office have topped
them all by making a reasonably watchable movie out of a book
about a leveraged buyout: Barbarians at the Gate, which will
receive its first showing on HBO this Saturday.
</p>
<p> It helped that HBO had a very good book (the 1990 best
seller Barbarians at the Gate, by Wall Street Journal reporters
Bryan Burrough and John Helyar) and a very big leveraged buyout
(Kohlberg Kravis Roberts' epic $25 billion takeover of RJR
Nabisco in 1988) to work with. And the $7 million HBO earmarked
for the project probably came in handy too. The film remains
reasonably faithful to the spirit of the book, while vastly
simplifying the plot. Whereas Burrough and Helyar recount a
story that involves dozens of rapacious financiers, greedy
executives, odious publicists, duplicitous bankers and devious
attorneys, hbo has boiled down the cast of characters to only
about a dozen. But they're all pretty avaricious, devious,
duplicitous or odious, so very little has been lost in
translation.
</p>
<p> To refresh all our memories, let's recall that the whole
RJR fiasco got started when a hard-drinking, cigar-smoking,
foul-mouthed Canadian expatriate named F. Ross Johnson, who for
some inexplicable reason found himself running the 19th largest
industrial company in the U.S., decided to take the food and
tobacco colossus private in a leveraged buyout.
</p>
<p> In this effort Johnson and six cronies combined forces
with James Robinson III, the well-liked but not especially
effective CEO of American Express, and Peter Cohen, the
not-so-well-liked and not-at-all-effective chairman and CEO of
Amex's subsidiary, Shearson Lehman Hutton. The triumvirate
offered stockholders a bid of $75 a share, which added up to
billions less than RJR was worth, making it quite a steal.
Worse, the deal left Johnson in control and allowed him a
package under which he and his pals could haul in as much as
$2.5 billion. Yes, billion.
</p>
<p> Johnson's brazen attempt at highway robbery attracted the
attention of Henry Kravis, the pixieish juggernaut from KKR, the
New York City firm that had written the book on leveraged
buyouts. Kravis, who months earlier had met with Johnson and
discussed the possibility of taking RJR Nabisco private, was
furious at Johnson for his double-dealing. With his cousin, and
KKR partner, George Roberts, Kravis submitted a
blow-them-out-of-the-water bid of $90 a share.
</p>
<p> Kravis' entry in turn aroused the interest of one after
another of the wheelers and dealers of Wall Street, all avid for
a piece of the action. After numerous bids, counterbids, leaks,
secret phone calls, threats, pizzas, lies, midnight meetings,
attempted bribes, snide remarks about cigarette smoke, and stabs
in the back, Kravis landed the company for $7.4 billion more
than Johnson had initially offered, and Johnson got to open a
$53 million golden parachute and take a hike.
</p>
<p> By the time Columbia Pictures started thinking about
filming Barbarians, whose rights had been optioned to veteran
producer Ray Stark (The Way We Were) for $700,000, evil
junk-bond genius Michael Milken was well on his way to jail, the
takeover era was over, and the public backlash against the
excesses of the '80s had started in a big way. Moreover, the
catastrophic flop of Brian De Palma's adaptation of Tom Wolfe's
Bonfire of the Vanities in 1990 had cooled Hollywood on the idea
of making movies set in Manhattan's financial district. Columbia
began to shy away from a project that did not seem to have much
appeal to the Terminator II crowd. When no other studio
expressed interest, Stark took Barbarians to HBO.
</p>
<p> The script by playwright and television writer Larry
Gelbart (M*A*S*H) focuses on the struggle between the two
central characters: Johnson, played by James Garner, and Kravis,
played by Jonathan Pryce, who starred in the Broadway hit
musical Miss Saigon. People familiar with Wall Street will have
serious problems with these two pieces of casting because Garner
doesn't behave much like Johnson and Price doesn't look anything
like Kravis.
</p>
<p> "Johnson is kind of a super maitre d', a guy who really
knows how to work a room," Gelbart explains. But in the book,
Burrough and Helyar also portray him as a Machiavellian
cutthroat who betrayed numerous colleagues on his way to the
top, a spendthrift who moved the RJR Nabisco headquarters to
Atlanta--callously firing thousands of employees in the
process--in part because he didn't like "bucolic"
Winston-Salem, and a derelict CEO who repeatedly misled his
shareholders, his employees and his board of directors.
</p>
<p> Garner, who has never met Johnson, and who deliberately
avoided reading the book, plays him as a salty-mouthed
backslapper who is always quick with a joke and whom everyone
seems to like. Johnson comes off as a likable gasbag--a rogue
perhaps, but deep down inside an O.K. guy. Garner is simply too
appealing to capture Johnson's reptilian qualities.
</p>
<p> Kravis doesn't get off so easily. Clearly Pryce, a tall,
refined, dapper Welshman, bears no physical or cultural
resemblance to the short, nouveau-riche, noncharismatic Kravis.
Moreover, the aloof Pryce does not seem like the sort of person
who would ever threaten to break both of a society columnist's
kneecaps at a benefit, as Kravis reportedly once did. In fact,
Pryce does not look like the sort of person who would threaten
to break even one of a society columnist's kneecaps.
Nevertheless, his performance works, in part because he is so
understatedly malevolent, in part because the question of
Kravis' height (5 ft., 6 in., shoes included) is ultimately
irrelevant. Pryce says this is the first time in his career he
has ever played a living person. However, he hastens to point
out, "I have played characters like him before." And who might
they be? "Richard III," Pryce responds. "Macbeth."
</p>
<p> The other figures portrayed in the film come off at least
as badly as they do in real life. Peter Riegert is right on
target as the cocky Shearson honcho Peter Cohen. The
basset-mugged Fred Dalton Thompson, though a bit jowly for the
part, is convincing as the charming but ineffectual Robinson,
who last month was shown the door of troubled American Express.
</p>
<p> Joanna Cassidy is perfect as Robinson's
flack-from-the-inferno wife Linda. (It was her firm that cooked
up the ingenious idea of sending its calaboose-bound client,
Michael Milken, to Shea Stadium, chaperoning hundreds of poor
black children, an incident that is still remembered as one of
the most cynical, albeit futile, stunts in the sorry history of
public relations.) Rita Wilson as Kravis' wife, the fashion
designer Carolyne Roehm, is quite believable in the role of a
woman whose single indulgence was a daily Oreo. Even the smaller
parts work quite well, notably Leilani Ferrer as Johnson's
thirtysomething wife Laurie, originally known to her critics as
"Cupcake," and then, after Ross finagled her an honorary
doctorate from some roadside Florida university, as "Dr.
Cupcake."
</p>
<p> What prevents Barbarians from being truly outstanding is
Garner's miscasting plus Gelbart's reluctance to pull the
trigger on the conniving Johnson. Example: in one scene, the
born-to-shop Dr. Cupcake tells Ross a heart-wrenching story
about her leg waxer's cousin, who was dumped from his job of 18
years when KKR took over his company. Seeking to illustrate the
human carnage of leveraged buyouts, she informs hubby that the
man went home and shot himself. Johnson looks concerned. Here,
the film is taking real liberties with the truth. This
conversation did not take place anywhere in Burrough and
Helyar's book. This conversation did not take place anywhere on
this planet.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>